Wednesday, January 25, 2017
Saturday, January 21, 2017
Thursday, January 19, 2017
Final Preparations
Packing resupply mail drops.
In case you ever wondered what 12 pounds of beef jerky looks like.
The current state of my kitchen:
In case you ever wondered what 12 pounds of beef jerky looks like.
Wednesday, January 18, 2017
A Beautiful Thing
I have made a new friend in India: brother Ravi. One of his ministries, and the one that caught my attention, is providing poor women with saris and dowries so that they can get married. In India, many women are mistreated, abused, and even killed over dowries (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dowry_system_in_India), and many more simply cannot marry, and thus often end up in the worst place a woman can end up--I don't even like to say the name, but you know what I mean.
This ministry reminds me of what the real St. Nicholas did, which seems to us comfortable Westerners like a tale out of the bad old days, so remote that it's nothing but an allegorical moral lesson. But much of the world is still in the darkness of paganism--modern India is in many ways very much like ancient Rome. (And the rest of the world, which once had the light of the Gospel, is moving with great determination and rapidity back toward that darkness.)
It only costs $4 to provide this beautiful gift to these lovely and vulnerable women. If you want to help, contact Bill Bray at Overseas Students Mission, who processes the funds for Ravi.
This ministry reminds me of what the real St. Nicholas did, which seems to us comfortable Westerners like a tale out of the bad old days, so remote that it's nothing but an allegorical moral lesson. But much of the world is still in the darkness of paganism--modern India is in many ways very much like ancient Rome. (And the rest of the world, which once had the light of the Gospel, is moving with great determination and rapidity back toward that darkness.)
It only costs $4 to provide this beautiful gift to these lovely and vulnerable women. If you want to help, contact Bill Bray at Overseas Students Mission, who processes the funds for Ravi.
Tuesday, January 10, 2017
Date Set!
I found a hostel in North Georgia that specializes in AT hikers. They're going to pick me up from the train station in Gainesville, put me up for the night, and then drop me off at the trailhead next morning.
I'm leaving here on Amtrak January 27th, and will hit the trail the 29th, Lord willing and barring unforeseen circumstances such as severe weather, in which case I'll be at the hostel additional days. Three weeks!
I'm leaving here on Amtrak January 27th, and will hit the trail the 29th, Lord willing and barring unforeseen circumstances such as severe weather, in which case I'll be at the hostel additional days. Three weeks!
Monday, January 9, 2017
Why Georgia?
The question inevitably arises, if my goal is to avoid the crowds of the northbound "bubble" on the trail, why not hike some other way in better weather? I could go north to south, flip-flop, etc., still avoid the pack, and not be hiking in the dark of winter.
The thing is, you see, I'm from Georgia. Born in Atlanta. And the AT has called to me since I was a boy. North Georgia was where we spent as much of our time off as possible; it's where my family is from, and it's the place from which I've always imagined starting the trail. It's familiar, and the North is the unknown, which I'll be walking off to explore. My father, my grandfather, my great grandfather, and my great-great grandfather are all buried 18 miles northwest of the trailhead, in Blue Ridge.
And I'll be starting at Amicalola Falls, on the "approach trail" rather than the official start of the AT at Springer Mountain, because that's where I've looked at this sign
The thing is, you see, I'm from Georgia. Born in Atlanta. And the AT has called to me since I was a boy. North Georgia was where we spent as much of our time off as possible; it's where my family is from, and it's the place from which I've always imagined starting the trail. It's familiar, and the North is the unknown, which I'll be walking off to explore. My father, my grandfather, my great grandfather, and my great-great grandfather are all buried 18 miles northwest of the trailhead, in Blue Ridge.
And I'll be starting at Amicalola Falls, on the "approach trail" rather than the official start of the AT at Springer Mountain, because that's where I've looked at this sign
all my life, and wished. I'll start at the top of the falls, though, rather than walking up from the bottom: I've done that hike plenty of times, including way back before they built the fancy wooden stairs. In fact, here are some photos I took of the falls, and from the top, when I was 8 or 9.
The approach trail isn't officially part of the AT, so I'm not cheating or avoiding anything by not repeating the falls climb, except a lot of exertion and exhaustion on my first day out.
There are other reasons, as well: more practical ones. For starters, I'm anxious and don't want to wait that long. I'm already antsy, sitting here waiting to begin, and sitting out the rest of the winter while waiting for the earliest I could start from Maine would be intolerable. Also, it's commonly reported that if you start from Mt. Katahdin as soon as it opens, you'll be passing through the north country at the height of the infamous and abominable blackfly season, and I hate bugs. Frankly, I'd rather deal with bitter cold any day than incessant swarms of tiny biting flies. There's still the "flip-flop" option, but that doesn't really feel like a through-hike to me, although I know the ATC recognizes it as such.
So, it's Winter in the southern Appalachians for me. I should be back through here sometime in the Spring, if anyone cares to have a visit.
Sunday, January 8, 2017
Adjustments
After going over the shortcomings of my sleep system, I've decided to go with an option that corrects both the hammock and sleeping bag issues at once, and get this. It's specifically designed to fit my hammock, and this company is a small business owned and run by two retired Army vets here in Virginia.
As an added bonus, it covers another dilemma; that of whether or not to take a seriously warm, big down parka "just in case" (specifically, the one I'm wearing in the photo at right). But with this system, the top quilt can double as a down boreal jacket in an emergency (as in, temperatures dropping way below zero on a windy mountaintop miles from anywhere suitable for camp). Also, I didn't mention this in detail before, but the combination of sleeping bag and insulation system I have made it a very complicated and slow process to get out of the hammock, and I hate the feeling of being trapped in there and not being able to get out quickly if I need to. Old habits, I guess. Military sleeping bag zippers, for instance, have a quick-open feature which allows you to just yank the two sides of the bag apart and it comes right open.
Unfortunately, the best option is also the most expensive option, and I've more or less wasted the money I spent on my sleeping bag and wool liner. But, they might still be useful someday in some other situation, so it's not that bad. I think I will, however, return the insulating underlayer portion of my hammock system, as I'm within their ten-day return window. But I'll keep the over-cover, as it's extremely light and small when packed, and will still be useful for extreme cold.
I've also ordered a better set of lighter-weight, more flexible and packable gore-tex top and bottoms to replace my military-style ECWCS ones. The ones I've got are just too heavy and bulky to pack efficiently when they're not being worn, and too loud and stiff when they are. Also, the hood is designed to be worn over a helmet and is annoyingly in the way without one, always falling in my eyes and blocking peripheral vision.
It seems (and feels) like a lot of money to get ready for this trip. But I'll be using this stuff for years to come, only tweaking or replacing a piece here or there for other trips and activities, so it'll pay off in the end.
As an added bonus, it covers another dilemma; that of whether or not to take a seriously warm, big down parka "just in case" (specifically, the one I'm wearing in the photo at right). But with this system, the top quilt can double as a down boreal jacket in an emergency (as in, temperatures dropping way below zero on a windy mountaintop miles from anywhere suitable for camp). Also, I didn't mention this in detail before, but the combination of sleeping bag and insulation system I have made it a very complicated and slow process to get out of the hammock, and I hate the feeling of being trapped in there and not being able to get out quickly if I need to. Old habits, I guess. Military sleeping bag zippers, for instance, have a quick-open feature which allows you to just yank the two sides of the bag apart and it comes right open.
Unfortunately, the best option is also the most expensive option, and I've more or less wasted the money I spent on my sleeping bag and wool liner. But, they might still be useful someday in some other situation, so it's not that bad. I think I will, however, return the insulating underlayer portion of my hammock system, as I'm within their ten-day return window. But I'll keep the over-cover, as it's extremely light and small when packed, and will still be useful for extreme cold.
I've also ordered a better set of lighter-weight, more flexible and packable gore-tex top and bottoms to replace my military-style ECWCS ones. The ones I've got are just too heavy and bulky to pack efficiently when they're not being worn, and too loud and stiff when they are. Also, the hood is designed to be worn over a helmet and is annoyingly in the way without one, always falling in my eyes and blocking peripheral vision.
It seems (and feels) like a lot of money to get ready for this trip. But I'll be using this stuff for years to come, only tweaking or replacing a piece here or there for other trips and activities, so it'll pay off in the end.
After Action Report
Warmth test successfully passed. I have, however, identified some deficiencies to be corrected before initiation of combat operations:
Deficiency #1: The interior of the hammock gets claustrophobic after I've been in there a while. I think this is because of the cold-weather "overcover" which covers the mesh top part of the hammock to keep in warmth. There's a ventilation hole near my face on one side, but it doesn't seem to be enough, and I'm not getting enough fresh oxygen.
Proposed Solution: Only use it in extreme cold and, when in use, arrange it so that there is some gap left at the top near my head. Adjust amount and location of gap as needed.
Deficiency #2: Back side begins to feel the cold through the hammock bottom as the night progresses and ambient and body temperatures drop.
Proposed Solution: Increase/change bottom insulation.
Deficiency #3: Sleeping bag awkward and difficult to get into and out of inside hammock. Zipper finicky and difficult to operate, especially while wearing gloves.
Possible Solutions: a) Replace sleeping bag. b) Replace sleeping bag with lightweight quilts designed for hammock camping. c) Adapt to sleeping bag through practice and patience.
Deficiency #4: Angle of hammock hang at foot end causes reverse pressure on knees (hyperextension). This has been noted by other hammock users, but it especially problematic for me because of my injuries.
Implemented Solution: Stuff empty sleeping bag stuff-sack with unworn outer layer (gore-tex shell) to create an under-knee pillow and relieve pressure.
Deficiency #5: Hammock pitch imperfect due to inexperience.
Proposed Solution: Get better.
Also, this can't be identified as a deficiency of the hammock, but I had trouble sleeping because of my sleep apnea and the absence of a CPAP. I'm looking into homeopathic ways of improving the disorder (one of which, fascinatingly, is magnesium, about which I have an entire other post to make). Also, once on the trail, fatigue will be my friend in this respect, as will continued weight loss. I may just have to deal with being less than perfectly well-rested during the early part.
Overall, I am quite pleased, and feeling very confident in my equipment. I've finally made up my mind and ordered a pair of insulated boots for winter hiking. My feet may end up getting overheated a bit during warm spells, but the consequences of hot feet are discomfort and blisters, whereas the consequences of cold feet are frostbite and loss of toes. I ordered them in a wider width than my others, so I can wear two pair of wool socks. Also, although having bought actual boots in very high quality, I'm not concerned that I'll go through 3-5 pairs of shoes during the course of the trail like people who wear the modern sneaker-type hiking shoes, there is a possibility that I'll wear the soles down to a point that they will need to be re-soled, or else will cause problems with my feet and ankles due to uneven wear. But with one pair for winter and one for summer, I should prevent this issue. (I'm not carrying both pairs with me: I'm preparing a box of summer clothes for my brother to mail to me when the weather warms up, at which point I'll mail back my winter gear.) I've also ordered an additional set of merino wool underwear: my camp clothes weren't quite warm enough without that layer, but the ones I've been wearing all day hiking will be damp from sweat when I stop. So this way, I'll have a dry pair to change into.
Speaking of my brother, another example of God's provision is that he and his family just moved back to their house in the NoVa area after his having retired from the Army, and they eagerly volunteered to keep my cat, watch my house (which I also offered them as a weekend getaway whenever they want), and act as my logistics base, mailing me resupply packages and such as I go along. Solved all my biggest worries about the trip in one fell swoop. I love living in His kingdom.
Deficiency #1: The interior of the hammock gets claustrophobic after I've been in there a while. I think this is because of the cold-weather "overcover" which covers the mesh top part of the hammock to keep in warmth. There's a ventilation hole near my face on one side, but it doesn't seem to be enough, and I'm not getting enough fresh oxygen.
Proposed Solution: Only use it in extreme cold and, when in use, arrange it so that there is some gap left at the top near my head. Adjust amount and location of gap as needed.
Deficiency #2: Back side begins to feel the cold through the hammock bottom as the night progresses and ambient and body temperatures drop.
Proposed Solution: Increase/change bottom insulation.
Deficiency #3: Sleeping bag awkward and difficult to get into and out of inside hammock. Zipper finicky and difficult to operate, especially while wearing gloves.
Possible Solutions: a) Replace sleeping bag. b) Replace sleeping bag with lightweight quilts designed for hammock camping. c) Adapt to sleeping bag through practice and patience.
Deficiency #4: Angle of hammock hang at foot end causes reverse pressure on knees (hyperextension). This has been noted by other hammock users, but it especially problematic for me because of my injuries.
Implemented Solution: Stuff empty sleeping bag stuff-sack with unworn outer layer (gore-tex shell) to create an under-knee pillow and relieve pressure.
Deficiency #5: Hammock pitch imperfect due to inexperience.
Proposed Solution: Get better.
Also, this can't be identified as a deficiency of the hammock, but I had trouble sleeping because of my sleep apnea and the absence of a CPAP. I'm looking into homeopathic ways of improving the disorder (one of which, fascinatingly, is magnesium, about which I have an entire other post to make). Also, once on the trail, fatigue will be my friend in this respect, as will continued weight loss. I may just have to deal with being less than perfectly well-rested during the early part.
Overall, I am quite pleased, and feeling very confident in my equipment. I've finally made up my mind and ordered a pair of insulated boots for winter hiking. My feet may end up getting overheated a bit during warm spells, but the consequences of hot feet are discomfort and blisters, whereas the consequences of cold feet are frostbite and loss of toes. I ordered them in a wider width than my others, so I can wear two pair of wool socks. Also, although having bought actual boots in very high quality, I'm not concerned that I'll go through 3-5 pairs of shoes during the course of the trail like people who wear the modern sneaker-type hiking shoes, there is a possibility that I'll wear the soles down to a point that they will need to be re-soled, or else will cause problems with my feet and ankles due to uneven wear. But with one pair for winter and one for summer, I should prevent this issue. (I'm not carrying both pairs with me: I'm preparing a box of summer clothes for my brother to mail to me when the weather warms up, at which point I'll mail back my winter gear.) I've also ordered an additional set of merino wool underwear: my camp clothes weren't quite warm enough without that layer, but the ones I've been wearing all day hiking will be damp from sweat when I stop. So this way, I'll have a dry pair to change into.
Speaking of my brother, another example of God's provision is that he and his family just moved back to their house in the NoVa area after his having retired from the Army, and they eagerly volunteered to keep my cat, watch my house (which I also offered them as a weekend getaway whenever they want), and act as my logistics base, mailing me resupply packages and such as I go along. Solved all my biggest worries about the trip in one fell swoop. I love living in His kingdom.
Saturday, January 7, 2017
Winterization Training
My old commander made up that term--it means "sitting outside in the cold freezing your @$$ off on purpose".
I've been waiting for it to get really cold so I can test out my gear. Sat outside last night and this morning to see if my clothes are warm enough. (They are--except that my mittens haven't arrived yet, so my hands were a bit cold in just the liner gloves.) My hammock finally arrived this week, just in time, and I set it up yesterday to learn how it works. Tonight, I'm sleeping in it; it's supposed to get down to around 15 degrees.
I'm thinking that Sunday I'll go for a hike, and see how my "walking outfit" does in real cold.
I'd like to see some single-digit or even negative temps before I leave, to test out the outer limits of my stuff before I'm stuck out there with it. Of course, if it comes down to a matter of survival, I'll build fires and even windbreaks and shelters--I know how to do all that. There are sections of the AT where you aren't supposed to, and it's discouraged along the whole length, because of the heavy use it gets. But you're also not supposed to die out there.
Tuesday, January 3, 2017
Wednesday, December 28, 2016
Thoughts on Starting the AT in Winter
I've set my start date for the Appalachian Trail for the first or second week in February. Exact date TBD.
Advantages:
1) I'll get a good head start on the crowds. And, being ahead of them, won't have to deal with the trashed conditions that they reputedly leave in their wake.
2) I'll have extra time to take an easier pace for the sake of my injuries, and still get to Maine in time (Mt. Katahdin, the northern end of the trail, closes on October 15th).
3) I'll avoid some of the worst heat by doing the southern portions before summer.
Disadvantages:
1) It will be cold.
2) I'll have to carry a heavier pack during the earlier stages. Because it will be cold.
3) It will put me in the highest elevations, in the Smokies, in early spring, where apparently, according to all the trail wisdom I've been able to find, it will be cold.
However, since one of my principal goals is to complete the final stages of my weight loss, the cold will actually work to my advantage. Colder temperatures mean more calories burned, as does extra weight carried.
Also, I like a challenge. In case you didn't already figure that out about me. I'm actually looking forward to climbing some of those frozen, windswept mountains above the treeline. I see it as a complement to my trek through the Florida swamps. Next I need to plan a hike through the desert, so I will have conquered all the types of challenging terrain the country has to offer. Hm...maybe a PCT through-hike next? And then maybe a snowshoeing journey through someplace wide and flat and really cold.
No need to worry about me though: I've bought plenty of winter gear. A 5 degree sleeping bag, silk underwear, two layers of wool, an outer layer of down, and a waterproof, windproof gore tex shell layer. Even got myself a pair of crampons (strongly recommended by previous winter AT hikers) so I don't slide off a mountain, and ski goggles so I don't get blinded by bad weather and get lost. I'll end up carrying most of it most of the time, but those few times I do use it, it will be essential. Better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it. Especially when you're talking about gear for staying alive in the cold.
Most of the time, while I'm walking, I'll only be wearing the light merino wool layer under my regular clothes, plus the gore tex if it's wet or windy; overheating is a greater concern while I'm moving than hypothermia. The rest of it is for after I stop. Climbing hills and carrying a pack, you sweat even when it's cold, and that plus fatigue equals getting chilled very quickly. So you have to carry a dry set of warm things to change into, plus you need much more insulation when you're sedentary in camp (and the temperature drops at night), including a dry change of hat, gloves, and footwear. So for camp, I have the silk liner layer, expedition-weight wool, and a down jacket and primaloft pants, over which I can wear the gore tex again if I need to, along with down booties and super-thick mountaineering socks. I also bought the extra cold weather shell for my hammock, and a merino wool sleeping bag liner. And if it gets ridiculously cold, I'm carrying two space blankets; there's this thing you can do where you put them over and under the hammock to reflect your heat back in.
Yeah, it sounds like I'm preparing for an expedition to the arctic. But not really: the stuff I've got is much lighter than what you'd wear someplace really cold, like Antarctica or Mt. Everest, or even far north like Canada. Here's the thing, though: winter is still winter, even in the South, and it gets cold enough to be seriously dangerous up in the mountains, even the relatively low Appalachians. We're talking about single-digit temperatures fairly regularly at night, and possibly sub-zero on occasion. And being stuck out in that kind of cold without adequate warm gear, in addition to being dangerous and potentially deadly, is just plain miserable. I speak from experience. Most of us have never been more than a few minutes' walk from somewhere heated and sheltered when it's cold: even if we're out away from buildings, we have our cars to retreat to, and to get us back to safety. But when you're outside all day and all night, every day, hours from shelter or even the nearest road, you have to plan for the worst and be prepared for any kind of weather you can realistically expect for wherever you are. So I'm going prepared for anything down to temperatures of ten or twenty below when I'm camped, and heavy snow and strong winds while I'm moving. If it gets worse than that, I'll have to get off the trail: bringing along arctic parka and snowshoes just isn't practical (although people who hike the northern sections of the AT in winter do routinely take those things).
In other news, the VA has very kindly scheduled me for a consult with a plastic surgeon, to repair the damage left by my weight loss. I am surprised but gratified; they are, after all, always on us about losing weight. So once I get back from my hike, having lost ALL the remaining fat, I'll be able to finally and totally put that part of my life to rest. The surgery will not only fix my skin, but will involve liposuctioning the adipose cells, which never otherwise go away (they only shrink; which is why it is so hard for formerly fat people to keep it off: the fat cells are just waiting there to start storing calories again.)
I have no intention nor desire to ever go back to eating the way I did which got me fat. But it will be an enormous relief to be able to just eat healthy and exercise, and not have to endlessly worry about every single calorie for the rest of my life because my body is constantly fighting against me and trying to get fat again. I would like to actually live, and not have that be the main focus of my existence.
Advantages:
1) I'll get a good head start on the crowds. And, being ahead of them, won't have to deal with the trashed conditions that they reputedly leave in their wake.
2) I'll have extra time to take an easier pace for the sake of my injuries, and still get to Maine in time (Mt. Katahdin, the northern end of the trail, closes on October 15th).
3) I'll avoid some of the worst heat by doing the southern portions before summer.
Disadvantages:
1) It will be cold.
2) I'll have to carry a heavier pack during the earlier stages. Because it will be cold.
3) It will put me in the highest elevations, in the Smokies, in early spring, where apparently, according to all the trail wisdom I've been able to find, it will be cold.
However, since one of my principal goals is to complete the final stages of my weight loss, the cold will actually work to my advantage. Colder temperatures mean more calories burned, as does extra weight carried.
Also, I like a challenge. In case you didn't already figure that out about me. I'm actually looking forward to climbing some of those frozen, windswept mountains above the treeline. I see it as a complement to my trek through the Florida swamps. Next I need to plan a hike through the desert, so I will have conquered all the types of challenging terrain the country has to offer. Hm...maybe a PCT through-hike next? And then maybe a snowshoeing journey through someplace wide and flat and really cold.
No need to worry about me though: I've bought plenty of winter gear. A 5 degree sleeping bag, silk underwear, two layers of wool, an outer layer of down, and a waterproof, windproof gore tex shell layer. Even got myself a pair of crampons (strongly recommended by previous winter AT hikers) so I don't slide off a mountain, and ski goggles so I don't get blinded by bad weather and get lost. I'll end up carrying most of it most of the time, but those few times I do use it, it will be essential. Better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it. Especially when you're talking about gear for staying alive in the cold.
Most of the time, while I'm walking, I'll only be wearing the light merino wool layer under my regular clothes, plus the gore tex if it's wet or windy; overheating is a greater concern while I'm moving than hypothermia. The rest of it is for after I stop. Climbing hills and carrying a pack, you sweat even when it's cold, and that plus fatigue equals getting chilled very quickly. So you have to carry a dry set of warm things to change into, plus you need much more insulation when you're sedentary in camp (and the temperature drops at night), including a dry change of hat, gloves, and footwear. So for camp, I have the silk liner layer, expedition-weight wool, and a down jacket and primaloft pants, over which I can wear the gore tex again if I need to, along with down booties and super-thick mountaineering socks. I also bought the extra cold weather shell for my hammock, and a merino wool sleeping bag liner. And if it gets ridiculously cold, I'm carrying two space blankets; there's this thing you can do where you put them over and under the hammock to reflect your heat back in.
Yeah, it sounds like I'm preparing for an expedition to the arctic. But not really: the stuff I've got is much lighter than what you'd wear someplace really cold, like Antarctica or Mt. Everest, or even far north like Canada. Here's the thing, though: winter is still winter, even in the South, and it gets cold enough to be seriously dangerous up in the mountains, even the relatively low Appalachians. We're talking about single-digit temperatures fairly regularly at night, and possibly sub-zero on occasion. And being stuck out in that kind of cold without adequate warm gear, in addition to being dangerous and potentially deadly, is just plain miserable. I speak from experience. Most of us have never been more than a few minutes' walk from somewhere heated and sheltered when it's cold: even if we're out away from buildings, we have our cars to retreat to, and to get us back to safety. But when you're outside all day and all night, every day, hours from shelter or even the nearest road, you have to plan for the worst and be prepared for any kind of weather you can realistically expect for wherever you are. So I'm going prepared for anything down to temperatures of ten or twenty below when I'm camped, and heavy snow and strong winds while I'm moving. If it gets worse than that, I'll have to get off the trail: bringing along arctic parka and snowshoes just isn't practical (although people who hike the northern sections of the AT in winter do routinely take those things).
In other news, the VA has very kindly scheduled me for a consult with a plastic surgeon, to repair the damage left by my weight loss. I am surprised but gratified; they are, after all, always on us about losing weight. So once I get back from my hike, having lost ALL the remaining fat, I'll be able to finally and totally put that part of my life to rest. The surgery will not only fix my skin, but will involve liposuctioning the adipose cells, which never otherwise go away (they only shrink; which is why it is so hard for formerly fat people to keep it off: the fat cells are just waiting there to start storing calories again.)
I have no intention nor desire to ever go back to eating the way I did which got me fat. But it will be an enormous relief to be able to just eat healthy and exercise, and not have to endlessly worry about every single calorie for the rest of my life because my body is constantly fighting against me and trying to get fat again. I would like to actually live, and not have that be the main focus of my existence.
Sunday, December 11, 2016
Nisi Dominus - Cum Dederit
Except the Lord build the house, they labour in vain that build it:
except the Lord keep the city, the watchman waketh but in vain.
It is vain for you to rise up early, to sit up late, to eat the bread of sorrows:
for he giveth to his beloved even in his sleep.
Lo, children are an heritage of the Lord:
and the fruit of the womb is his reward.
As arrows are in the hand of a mighty man;
so are children of the youth.
Happy is the man that hath his quiver full of them:
they shall not be ashamed,
but they shall speak with the enemies in the gate.
-- Psalm 127
Saturday, December 10, 2016
T-rex DNA
I'm watching this documentary about the woman who found blood cells, soft tissue, and DNA in Tyrannosaur bones. Of course the "scientific community" says that's impossible. One "scientist" even said, "I don't care what the data says, it's simply not possible," which pretty much sums up what's wrong with the whole crew of them.
As she's discussing this, Dr. Schweitzer says that she thinks DNA is much hardier than anyone ever believed. But I have an alternative hypothesis: the fossils aren't as old as you're assuming. Every culture on earth has stories, art, and histories of giant, terrifying lizard-things. And when we dig in the ground, we find the bones of giant, terrifying lizard-things. 2+2=4.
So, for example, here's a passage from the Bible; Job 41, to be exact:
The top one is a saltwater crocodile skeleton. The bottom is, obviously, a Tyrannosaurus Rex. Imagine the Tyrannosaur living amphibiously in deep water, like the crocodile, hunting as an ambush predator, like the crocodile. That would explain its huge back legs and tiny front ones: the back legs were used to swim and to propel the T-rex out of the water to catch its prey, whereas the front ones were just for paddling. Like this:
This is just some very basic deduction: I'm not a scientist. What I'm saying is that the Scientists' pre-formed assumptions and prejudices are blinding them to the actual data. They're unable to form any conclusions or hypotheses that may be contrary to their dogmatically-held positions and intellectual idols.
Guys, your whole time-line is off. The theory that dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago, along with the entire system of extreme ages, was created because the scientists needed the time to be that long, in order for their Darwinist theories to be correct. It's all based on equations, and as anyone who's taken basic algebra should understand, an equation is only as accurate as the variables you plug into it. So, if you need your time periods to be millions of years, you start plugging in one of the variables until you get something that seems to work with the others. But it's basically guess-work. The same equation could work with much smaller numbers.
Does that mean the Earth is only 6,000 years old? Not necessarily. I believe that, in order to take the Bible as literally true, we have to assume that Man is only about 6,000 years old, because of the genealogies. But the Earth itself, and animal life, could be much older. But a truly scientific, unbiased view of the evidence reveals that there are many and major holes in the millions and millions of years theory. Remember the coelacanth?
I couldn't find a clip of the bit I wanted, but here's a taste of the documentary. The whole thing is available on Netflix, under the title "Dinosaurs: the Hunt for Life".
addendum: Here's another contender for the identity of Job's leviathan--Deinosuchus. This one is recognized as a water-dweller; he's basically a giant crocodile. I'd say a crocodile-like creature big enough to prey on T-rex would be scary enough to warrant the description given in Job. But, of course, they also are supposed to have been extinct millions of years before Man existed, as were all the other giant crocodilians in the fossil record, if "their" theories are correct.
As she's discussing this, Dr. Schweitzer says that she thinks DNA is much hardier than anyone ever believed. But I have an alternative hypothesis: the fossils aren't as old as you're assuming. Every culture on earth has stories, art, and histories of giant, terrifying lizard-things. And when we dig in the ground, we find the bones of giant, terrifying lizard-things. 2+2=4.
So, for example, here's a passage from the Bible; Job 41, to be exact:
Canst thou draw out leviathan with an hook? or his tongue with a cord which thou lettest down?Now, whether you believe in the Bible or not, this is literary evidence. If you're a Christian, then it's kinda important because it's God himself speaking. If you're not, it's still a record of some creature that the writer had direct knowledge of--it occurs in a list of real-world animals and their descriptions, not mythological or fanciful ones. So, with that description in mind, look at these two pictures:
Canst thou put an hook into his nose? or bore his jaw through with a thorn?
Will he make many supplications unto thee? will he speak soft words unto thee?
Will he make a covenant with thee? wilt thou take him for a servant for ever?
Wilt thou play with him as with a bird? or wilt thou bind him for thy maidens?
Shall the companions make a banquet of him? shall they part him among the merchants?
Canst thou fill his skin with barbed irons? or his head with fish spears?
Lay thine hand upon him, remember the battle, do no more.
Behold, the hope of him is in vain: shall not one be cast down even at the sight of him?
None is so fierce that dare stir him up: who then is able to stand before me?
Who hath prevented me, that I should repay him? whatsoever is under the whole heaven is mine.
I will not conceal his parts, nor his power, nor his comely proportion.
Who can discover the face of his garment? or who can come to him with his double bridle?
Who can open the doors of his face? his teeth are terrible round about.
His scales are his pride, shut up together as with a close seal.
One is so near to another, that no air can come between them.
They are joined one to another, they stick together, that they cannot be sundered.
By his neesings a light doth shine, and his eyes are like the eyelids of the morning.
Out of his mouth go burning lamps, and sparks of fire leap out.
Out of his nostrils goeth smoke, as out of a seething pot or caldron.
His breath kindleth coals, and a flame goeth out of his mouth.
In his neck remaineth strength, and sorrow is turned into joy before him.
The flakes of his flesh are joined together: they are firm in themselves; they cannot be moved.
His heart is as firm as a stone; yea, as hard as a piece of the nether millstone.
When he raiseth up himself, the mighty are afraid: by reason of breakings they purify themselves.
The sword of him that layeth at him cannot hold: the spear, the dart, nor the habergeon.
He esteemeth iron as straw, and brass as rotten wood.
The arrow cannot make him flee: slingstones are turned with him into stubble.
Darts are counted as stubble: he laugheth at the shaking of a spear.
Sharp stones are under him: he spreadeth sharp pointed things upon the mire.
He maketh the deep to boil like a pot: he maketh the sea like a pot of ointment.
He maketh a path to shine after him; one would think the deep to be hoary.
Upon earth there is not his like, who is made without fear.
He beholdeth all high things: he is a king over all the children of pride.
The top one is a saltwater crocodile skeleton. The bottom is, obviously, a Tyrannosaurus Rex. Imagine the Tyrannosaur living amphibiously in deep water, like the crocodile, hunting as an ambush predator, like the crocodile. That would explain its huge back legs and tiny front ones: the back legs were used to swim and to propel the T-rex out of the water to catch its prey, whereas the front ones were just for paddling. Like this:
This is just some very basic deduction: I'm not a scientist. What I'm saying is that the Scientists' pre-formed assumptions and prejudices are blinding them to the actual data. They're unable to form any conclusions or hypotheses that may be contrary to their dogmatically-held positions and intellectual idols.
Guys, your whole time-line is off. The theory that dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago, along with the entire system of extreme ages, was created because the scientists needed the time to be that long, in order for their Darwinist theories to be correct. It's all based on equations, and as anyone who's taken basic algebra should understand, an equation is only as accurate as the variables you plug into it. So, if you need your time periods to be millions of years, you start plugging in one of the variables until you get something that seems to work with the others. But it's basically guess-work. The same equation could work with much smaller numbers.
Does that mean the Earth is only 6,000 years old? Not necessarily. I believe that, in order to take the Bible as literally true, we have to assume that Man is only about 6,000 years old, because of the genealogies. But the Earth itself, and animal life, could be much older. But a truly scientific, unbiased view of the evidence reveals that there are many and major holes in the millions and millions of years theory. Remember the coelacanth?
I couldn't find a clip of the bit I wanted, but here's a taste of the documentary. The whole thing is available on Netflix, under the title "Dinosaurs: the Hunt for Life".
addendum: Here's another contender for the identity of Job's leviathan--Deinosuchus. This one is recognized as a water-dweller; he's basically a giant crocodile. I'd say a crocodile-like creature big enough to prey on T-rex would be scary enough to warrant the description given in Job. But, of course, they also are supposed to have been extinct millions of years before Man existed, as were all the other giant crocodilians in the fossil record, if "their" theories are correct.
Sunday, December 4, 2016
"You're why cavemen chiseled on walls."
This should have gone with my post about paleolithic art, but it didn't occur to me until later. This is exactly what I was trying to say.
Friday, December 2, 2016
Back on the Trail
I was idly browsing on REI the other day, and happened across the perfect backpack. I'd been thinking of getting one for a while, ever since my cross-continental hike ended prematurely, but it's really hard to find the right one for my size. Most non-military packs aren't made to accommodate my shoulder width or chest girth. Also, I dislike the bright colors civilian outdoor gear typically comes in. And it was marked way down, to less than a third of its original price.
So I figured, well, since I bought a new pack, I may as well get the rest of the lightweight gear I need, including the replacement for the tent that was destroyed in the storm my last night on the trail (I went with one of these nifty hammocks), and a new sleeping bag that weighs 1/4 what the army one I carried does. And, while I was at it, I figured I'd go ahead and get the thing I'd been looking on REI for in the first place, a super-cool featherweight titanium cook/mess kit and pretty much the smallest/lightest stove in the world which, not coincidentally, fits right inside the mess kit, along with its fuel canister.
And then I figured, well, since I've got all this new stuff, I may as well hike the AT.
I'm hoping to leave in late February or early March; I want to get a jump on the "bubble", when the bulk of other people start from Georgia in April. That'll mean I'll have some cold nights during the early part of my hike, but I'm getting extra insulating layers for my new hammock, which I can send home to save weight when the weather warms enough, along with a few clothing items.
Between my weight loss and the significantly lightened load, I'll be carrying well over a hundred pounds less than before. I think that, combined with my nifty new high-tech knee brace, will allow me to finish this time. Just to give you an idea of the old/new weight ratio, here are some of the major gear items:
Old
Empty Pack - 12 lbs.
Sleeping Bag - 10 lbs.
Tent, Poles, Stakes, and Sleeping Pad - 9 lbs.
Stove with fuel, Full Fuel Bottle, Mess Kit, Canteen Cup - 5.5 lbs.
New
Empty Pack - 5 lbs.
Sleeping Bag - 2.5 lbs.
Hammock with extra insulating layers for cold weather - 3.5 lbs.
Stove, Cook/Mess Kit. + 2 Fuel Canisters - 1.5 lbs.
So that's 24 pounds saved right there. That alone would make a major difference, and I'm going to try and save even more, and keep my total weight carried between 35 and 45 lbs., including food and water. I hike twice a week on the AT right now with 25, and don't even really feel the pack, so if I could come in at around 35 that would be ideal.
Empty Pack - 12 lbs.
Sleeping Bag - 10 lbs.
Tent, Poles, Stakes, and Sleeping Pad - 9 lbs.
Stove with fuel, Full Fuel Bottle, Mess Kit, Canteen Cup - 5.5 lbs.
New
Empty Pack - 5 lbs.
Sleeping Bag - 2.5 lbs.
Hammock with extra insulating layers for cold weather - 3.5 lbs.
Stove, Cook/Mess Kit. + 2 Fuel Canisters - 1.5 lbs.
So that's 24 pounds saved right there. That alone would make a major difference, and I'm going to try and save even more, and keep my total weight carried between 35 and 45 lbs., including food and water. I hike twice a week on the AT right now with 25, and don't even really feel the pack, so if I could come in at around 35 that would be ideal.
The main thing I need to find is a pet-sitter. Either someone to check in a couple of times a week and refill his food and make sure the house hasn't burned down, or a full-fledged housesitter.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)